“`html “`

RV-004 · LX-PER(HW+FA)

Olga Goodman, MD

On This Page

RV-004 · Structured vs Conventional Radiology Report — RheumaView™
RheumaView™ · RV-004 · LX-PER(HW+FA)

The Same Films, Read Two Ways

A conventional radiology report beside a RheumaView™ structured radiographic report — identical radiographs of the hands, wrists, feet and ankles, two architectures of reading, tracked across four timepoints.

De-identified case · Hispanic female · longitudinal 2020–2026

Hispanic femaleages 45 → 51 baseline 2020Radiograph hands/wrists + feet/ankles4 timepoints (~6 yr)
Complexity: Longitudinal · 4 timepoints · ~6 yr · Radiograph · single-modality
Why this is a representative longitudinal case

This is a representative longitudinal case: a single modality (radiograph) read across four timepoints over about six years. The complexity here comes from temporal tracking and per-joint serial comparison, not from multi-modality fusion. See how case complexity scales ↓

What a typical report says
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING — RADIOLOGY REPORT
Conventional radiographic interpretation
Patient
De-identified
Sex / Age
Female · 51 years
Exam
Radiographs — bilateral hands and wrists, bilateral feet and ankles
Date of service
Current (index) study
Clinical indication
Rheumatoid arthritis. Evaluate.
Comparison
Prior radiographs (2024, 2023, 2020)
Technique
Multiple radiographic projections as above.

FINDINGS

Hands and wrists

Bone mineralization is grossly maintained. The visualized carpal, metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints are preserved without significant erosion. Minor degenerative changes. No fracture or destructive bony lesion. Soft tissues are unremarkable.

Feet and ankles

Alignment is maintained with low arches bilaterally. Mild degenerative changes, most pronounced at the great toe joints. Small plantar calcaneal spurs. The remaining articulations are preserved without aggressive erosion. No acute fracture or dislocation.

IMPRESSION

  1. No significant erosive abnormality of the hands or feet.
  2. Mild degenerative changes of the hands and feet, most pronounced at the great toe and midfoot.
  3. Small plantar calcaneal spurs and mild flatfoot.
  4. No acute fracture or dislocation. No significant interval change compared with prior studies.

Electronically signed.

RheumaView™ structured report

CLINICAL RADIOOGRAPHIC REPORT – LONGITUDINAL

1. HEADER

  • Patient: Hispanic female
  • Clinical context: Rheumatoid arthritis, currently well controlled on hydroxychloroquine
  • Index studies:
  • 2026: Bilateral feet and ankles
  • Comparison studies:
  • 2024: Bilateral hands/wrists, feet and ankles
  • 2023: Bilateral hands/wrists, feet and ankles
  • 2020: Bilateral feet and ankles
  • Approximate inter-study intervals: ~3 years, then ~14 months, then ~19 months (total span ~6 years).
  • Region set:
  • Hands and wrists (bilateral)
  • Feet and ankles (bilateral)
  • Projection set (representative, per region):
  • Hands/wrists: PA and oblique views, both sides
  • Feet: AP (dorsoplantar), oblique, lateral views, both sides
  • Ankles: AP/mortise-style and lateral views, both sides

2. TECHNICAL / ALIGNMENT OVERVIEW

  • Overall image quality adequate on all dates; no major motion or positioning artifact obscuring joint margins.
  • Bone mineralization appropriate for age; no diffuse demineralization or osteopenic pattern dominating interpretation.

3. REGION-BY-REGION FINDINGS – INDEX + LONGITUDINAL COMPARISON

3.1 Hands and wrists (2024 vs 2023)

Right hand/wrist – PA & oblique

  • Radiocarpal and intercarpal joint spaces preserved; carpal rows well aligned, no carpal collapse.
  • MCP, PIP, DIP and thumb IP joint spaces preserved without focal, clearly erosive-type narrowing.
  • No definite marginal erosions at distal radius/ulna, carpal bones, MCP heads or phalangeal bases.
  • No periostitis, no bony ankylosis, no subluxations or dislocations.
  • No visible chondrocalcinosis or soft-tissue calcifications.

Left hand/wrist – PA & oblique

  • Radiocarpal and intercarpal joint spaces preserved; normal carpal alignment.
  • MCP, PIP, DIP and thumb IP joint spaces preserved; no focal inflammatory-type narrowing.
  • No definite marginal erosions at distal radius/ulna, carpal bones, MCP heads or phalangeal bases.
  • No periostitis, ankylosis or subluxation/dislocation.
  • No chondrocalcinosis or soft-tissue calcifications.

Longitudinal hand/wrist comparison (2024 vs 2023)

  • No new erosions and no progression of joint-space loss in any carpal, MCP, PIP or DIP joint.
  • Overall configuration of carpal rows and small joints unchanged.
  • Pattern remains non-erosive over this interval.

3.2 Feet and ankles – RIGHT side (2026 vs 2024 vs 2023 vs 2020)

Right foot – AP/oblique/lateral

  • Mild hallux valgus with mild joint-space narrowing and small dorsal osteophytes at the first MTP joint; present on 2020 study and similar on all subsequent exams.
  • Mild midfoot/tarsometatarsal osteophytes with preserved joint spaces; appearance stable to minimally more conspicuous but still mild across the series.
  • Plantar calcaneal enthesophyte (spur) present on earliest study with gradual, slight enlargement by 2026; tiny posterior calcaneal spur also present. No erosions or destructive change of the calcaneus.
  • Mild pes planus alignment (talo–first-metatarsal relationship), unchanged over time.
  • Remaining MTP and IP joints with preserved joint spaces; no definite marginal erosions at metatarsal heads or phalangeal bases.
  • No periostitis, ankylosis, or stress fracture identified.

Right ankle – AP/mortise & lateral

  • Tibiotalar joint space preserved without focal narrowing.
  • Medial and lateral malleoli intact; no marginal erosions or cortical destructive changes.
  • Subtalar joint preserved.
  • No osteochondral defect of the talar dome seen.

Longitudinal comparison – right foot/ankle

  • Over 6-year interval, degenerative/enthesopathic changes (first-MTP OA, midfoot spurs, calcaneal spur) show at most mild progression.
  • No development of erosions, subluxations or clear inflammatory-type joint-space loss.

3.3 Feet and ankles – LEFT side (2026 vs 2024 vs 2023 vs 2020)

Left foot – AP/oblique/lateral

  • Mild hallux valgus with mild joint-space narrowing and small dorsal osteophytes at the first MTP joint, present in 2020 and similar on later studies.
  • Mild midfoot/tarsometatarsal osteophytes with preserved joint spaces; appearance stable to minimally more conspicuous but mild.
  • Plantar calcaneal spur present on 2020 images with minimal interval increase by 2026; no adjacent erosions.
  • Mild pes planus alignment, unchanged.
  • Remaining MTP and IP joints show preserved joint spaces without definite marginal erosions.
  • No periostitis, ankylosis, or fracture identified.

Left ankle – AP/mortise & lateral

  • Tibiotalar joint space preserved; no focal narrowing.
  • Medial and lateral malleoli intact; no erosive change.
  • Subtalar joint preserved; no collapse or gross OA.
  • No talar dome osteochondral defect.

Longitudinal comparison – left foot/ankle

  • Mild degenerative/enthesopathic features (first-MTP OA, midfoot osteophytes, plantar spur) show at most very slow, mild progression.
  • No erosions, subluxations, or characteristic inflammatory joint-space loss at MTPs, midfoot joints, ankles or subtalar joints over 6 years.

4. SYNTHESIS / LONGITUDINAL TRAJECTORY

  • Hands/wrists: Non-erosive on both available dates, with stable joint spaces and carpal alignment and no radiographic transformation into erosive RA.
  • Feet/ankles: Mild bilateral first-MTP and midfoot osteoarthritis plus chronic plantar calcaneal enthesopathy and mild pes planus, all present on earliest available studies and evolving only minimally.
  • Across 6 years of serial imaging, there is no radiographic trajectory toward erosive rheumatoid arthritis in either hands or feet/ankles.
  • Observed structural changes are small-burden, predominantly mechanical/degenerative and enthesopathic rather than erosive/inflammatory.

5. IMPRESSION

  1. Hands and wrists (2024 vs 2023)
    • Non-erosive study of both hands and wrists.
    • No new erosions, no progressive joint-space loss and no deformity to suggest active, structurally aggressive RA over the comparison interval.
  2. Feet and ankles (2026 vs 2024 vs 2023 vs 2020)
    • Mild, bilateral first-MTP and midfoot osteoarthritis with mild hallux valgus and chronic plantar calcaneal enthesophytes; pattern and tempo consistent with degenerative/enthesopathic change.
    • No definite erosions or inflammatory-type joint-space loss in MTPs, midfoot joints, ankles or subtalar joints on any study.
  3. Overall longitudinal conclusion
    • Over approximately 6 years of follow-up, radiographs of hands, wrists, feet and ankles are concordant with well-controlled, non-erosive rheumatoid arthritis, with only mild, largely mechanical/degenerative and enthesopathic findings and no structural progression to erosive disease.

6. EMR SUMMARY

  • Serial X-rays of your hands, wrists, feet and ankles over the last 6 years do not show joint damage from rheumatoid arthritis.
  • There is only mild wear-and-tear arthritis at the big-toe joints and some chronic heel-spur changes, which have changed very slowly and remain mild.
  • Overall, the imaging pattern fits well-controlled, non-erosive RA without radiographic progression.

Adequacy / data integrity

  • Serial coverage: four timepoints (2020, 2023, 2024, 2026; ~6-year span).
  • Region coverage complete: bilateral hands/wrists and feet/ankles.
  • Positioning adequate for serial comparison on all dates.
  • Detector mix noted (older film 2020/2023; modern detector 2024/2026) — non-limiting for structural comparison.

Data adequacy / unresolved

  • Radiographs characterize structure, not disease activity — ultrasound or MRI would be required to assess synovitis / active inflammation.
  • No dedicated weight-bearing foot views or DEXA in this set.
  • Grades shown are image-derived and semiquantitative — not formal central-read indices.
Research analytic addendum · READY++ (non-clinical)

Research Analytic Addendum – Longitudinal Radiography (Hands and Feet)

Studies: 2020, 2023, 2024, 2026

Approximate inter-study intervals: ~3 years, then ~14 months, then ~19 months (total span ~6 years).

Region set: bilateral hands, wrists, feet, ankles

1. Dataset overview

Year Regions Projections (representative) Adequacy / quality notes
2020Hands, wrists, feet, anklesPA / oblique hands; DP / oblique / lateral feet & anklesSlightly higher noise, but anatomic coverage complete and positioning adequate for serial comparison.
2023Hands, wrists, feet, anklesPA / oblique hands; DP / oblique / lateral feet & anklesSimilar positioning; good bony contrast.
2024Hands, wrists, feet, anklesPA / oblique hands; DP / oblique / lateral feet & anklesModern detector; consistently higher resolution; no change in field-of-view.
2026Hands, wrists, feet, anklesPA / oblique hands; DP / oblique / lateral feet & anklesBest overall image quality; serves as structural reference for current morphology.

Excerpt · image-derived semiquantitative · not formal central-read scores.

structuredper-joint gradingpattern separation (mechanical vs inflammatory)mimic-controllaterality resolvedlongitudinal baseline (4 timepoints)incidental captureexplicit data-needsoutput-depth tiers

The radiographs

2026age 51hands/wrists + feet/anklesOpen 2026 compilation (enlarged views) ↗

Right hand & wrist

RRight hand/wrist — PA
PA
RRight hand/wrist — PA (alternate)
PA (alternate)
RRight hand/wrist — oblique
oblique
RRight hand — PA (coned)
PA (coned)
RRight hand — oblique (coned)
oblique (coned)

Left hand & wrist

LLeft hand/wrist — PA
PA
LLeft hand/wrist — oblique
oblique
LLeft hand/wrist — oblique (alternate)
oblique (alternate)
LLeft hand — PA (coned)
PA (coned)
LLeft hand — oblique (coned)
oblique (coned)

Right foot & ankle

RRight foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
RRight foot — oblique
oblique
RRight foot/ankle — lateral
lateral
RRight ankle — AP / mortise
AP / mortise

Left foot & ankle

LLeft foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
LLeft foot — oblique
oblique
LLeft foot/ankle — lateral
lateral
LLeft ankle — AP / mortise
AP / mortise
2024age 49hands/wrists + feet/anklesOpen 2024 compilation (enlarged views) ↗

Right hand & wrist

RdemoRight hand/wrist — PA
PA
RdemoRight hand/wrist — oblique
oblique

Left hand & wrist

LdemoLeft hand/wrist — PA
PA
LdemoLeft hand/wrist — oblique
oblique

Right foot & ankle

RdemoRight foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
RdemoRight foot — oblique
oblique
RdemoRight foot/ankle — lateral
lateral
RdemoRight ankle — AP / mortise
AP / mortise

Left foot & ankle

LdemoLeft foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
LdemoLeft foot — oblique
oblique
LdemoLeft foot/ankle — lateral
lateral
LdemoLeft ankle — AP / mortise
AP / mortise

Previews shown at demo resolution. Enlarged views are in the linked by-year compilation; full-resolution images are available on request.

2023age 48hands/wrists + feet/anklesOpen 2023 compilation (enlarged views) ↗

Right hand & wrist

RdemoRight hand/wrist — PA
PA
RdemoRight hand/wrist — PA (alt)
PA (alt)

Left hand & wrist

LdemoLeft hand/wrist — PA
PA
LdemoLeft hand/wrist — PA (alt)
PA (alt)

Right foot & ankle

RdemoRight foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
RdemoRight foot/ankle — lateral
lateral
RdemoRight ankle — AP / mortise
AP / mortise
RdemoRight foot — oblique
oblique

Left foot & ankle

LdemoLeft foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
LdemoLeft foot/ankle — lateral
lateral
LdemoLeft ankle — AP / mortise
AP / mortise
LdemoLeft foot — AP / oblique
AP / oblique

Previews shown at demo resolution. Enlarged views are in the linked by-year compilation; full-resolution images are available on request.

2020age 45feet/ankles (baseline)Open 2020 compilation (enlarged views) ↗

Right foot & ankle

RdemoRight foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
RdemoRight foot — oblique
oblique

Left foot & ankle

LdemoLeft foot — AP (dorsoplantar)
AP (dorsoplantar)
LdemoLeft foot — oblique
oblique

Previews shown at demo resolution. Enlarged views are in the linked by-year compilation; full-resolution images are available on request.

How case complexity scales

Foundational
Single date · one modality

One study, one timepoint. Structure read once.

Longitudinal · This case
Multiple timepoints over time

Per-joint serial comparison across 4 dates (~6 yr); temporal tracking contributes the added complexity.

Multi-modality
More than one modality combined

Radiograph plus US / MRI / DEXA; cross-modality reading compounds complexity further.

Download the structured reports

By-year image compilations (enlarged views) are linked within each year above. Individual de-identified full-resolution images are available on request.

De-identified demonstration case for healthcare-professional audiences. Not a diagnostic device and not for diagnostic use. Grades and scores are image-derived and semiquantitative, not formal central-read indices.

Olga Goodman, MD

Rheumatologist and creator of RheumaView™.